Amendment C126 what this means for planning permit applications

Bayside City Council have announced that they will adopt the Planning Panel’s recommendations on C126 Amendment which will ensure building height controls are discretionary rather than mandatory in certain designated areas. This comes after several changes and delays to the amendment which included two public exhibitions following concerns from the public over its lack of justification and non-consistency with planning policy and the Victoria Planning Provisions. 

The new amendment was bought in to implement the Bayside Small Activity Centre Strategy 2014 into the Bayside Planning Scheme by introducing new planning scheme policies, rezoning specific areas and replacing Design and Development Overlays in 31 small shopping centres. Bayside City Council introduced the amendment to ensure that development of what the council identified as ‘Small Activity Centres’ was kept minimal to moderate and protected against building heights over a certain storey.

In a statement Bayside City Council said the reason for Amendment C126 was ‘to ensure these small shopping strips continue to thrive into the future” as they ‘provide daily conveniences, local employment and services.’

However the amendment has not been without controversy. In 2017 the amendment was exhibited to the public who were invited to make submissions. There were numerous submissions made to Bayside regarding the amendment. As is the required statutory process, an independent planning panel was then appointed to consider the submissions and issued their report and recommendations which can be read in full here.

Mandatory building height restriction

Many of the public submissions that were made were critically of the amendment brought into question the strategic planning behind it. The most contentious part being the mandatory building height restrictions in the Small Activity Centres that were proposed in the changes to the Design and Development Overlays. This meant that planning permits would not be issued to buildings over a certain height which included 9 metres (2 storeys) in Design and Development Overlay Schedule 13 and 11 metres (3 storeys) in Design and Development Overlay Schedule 14. This was seen to be unwarranted and too restrictive.

Bayside defended the amendment stating it had “sound strategic justification, being grounded in studies examining the economic, town planning and urban design aspects of activity centres at the lower end of its hierarchy…”

However due to the high number of submissions from the public following the initial exhibition, the council commissioned further studies in 2017. These informed additional changes to the amendment which was then re-exhibited. 170 submissions were made to the council overall.

Bayside City Council held a meeting on the 19 March 2019 where they discussed the newest recommendations from the Panel. It was concluded from the meeting that Bayside would adopt the Panel’s recommendations which ensured discretionary rather than mandatory height controls in the majority of Smaller Activity Centres. Along with revisions to the Bayside Small Activity Centre Strategy 2014.

In a statement issued on 25 March 2019 Bayside Council said that the amendment will bring ‘more certainty around height controls’ and ‘create more vibrant small activity centres through introducing design requirements which will protect local commercial uses and ensure access for local communities.'

However, in their meeting the council concluded to ‘immediately commence’ a further study that would support the mandatory building height requirements in Small Neighbourhood Activity Centres which have not been supported by the Planning Panel.

Planning permit applications & the Planning permit register

So what does this mean for planning permit applications?

The new amendment does not officially come into effect until it has been submitted and approved by the Minister of Planning which will most likely take some time. Therefore planning applications that are already on Bayside City Council’s planning register or are going to be lodged soon should not, in theory, be restricted by these amendments.

However as council are the ones deciding on applications they usually will adopt the amendments before they have been approved by the Minster of Planning as it is assumed that the amendments will be approved and so council want to adopt the new planning controls as soon as possible to stop permit being issued that are inconsistent with the new planning regulations. 

A summary of the height controls in Amendments C126 are:

Centre Name

Height recommended by Panel

Panel recommendation for height control

Balcombe Park, Beaumaris

3 storeys

Discretionary

Balcombe Road and Charman Road, Beaumaris

3 storeys

Discretionary

Bay Road and Avoca Street, Cheltenham

3 storeys

Discretionary

Bay Road and Jack Road, Cheltenham

3 storeys

Discretionary

Beach Road and Georgiana Street, Sandringham

3 storeys

Discretionary

Bluff Road & Arranmore Avenue, Black Rock

3 storeys

Discretionary

Bluff Road & Bay Road, Sandringham

3 storeys

Discretionary

Bluff Road & Edward Street, Black Rock/Sandringham

2-3 storeys

Discretionary

Bluff Road & Highett Road Centre, Hampton

3-4 storeys

Discretionary

Bluff Road and Love Street, Black Rock

3 storeys

Discretionary

Bluff Road and Spring Street, Sandringham

3 storeys

Discretionary

Brighton Beach (Were Street) Centre, Brighton

3 storeys

Discretionary

Dendy Village, Brighton

3 storeys

Discretionary

East Brighton Shopping Centre, Brighton East

2-3 storeys

Discretionary / Mandatory

Esplanade & Grosvenor Street, Middle Brighton

3 storeys

Mandatory

Hampton Street & Durrant Street, Brighton

removed from amendment

Hawthorn Road Shopping Centre, Brighton East

3 storeys

Discretionary

Highett & Spring Road (Little Highett Village), Highett

2 storeys

Discretionary

Keith Street & Widdop Crescent, Hampton East

2 storeys

Discretionary

Keys Street Shopping Centre, Beaumaris

3 storeys

Mandatory

Ludstone Street, Hampton

2 storeys

Discretionary

Nepean Highway and Centre Road, Brighton East

4 storeys

Discretionary

Nepean Highway and Milroy Street, Brighton East

4 storeys

Discretionary

Nepean Highway and North Road, Brighton

removed from amendment

Nepean Highway and Union Street, Brighton East

4 storeys

Discretionary

New Street & Bay Street, Brighton

4 storeys

Discretionary

New Street & Martin Street, Brighton

3 storeys

Discretionary

Seaview Shopping Centre, Beaumaris

3 storeys

Discretionary

South Road & Esplanade Avenue, Brighton

3-4 storeys

Mandatory

South Road Plaza, Hampton

4 storeys

Discretionary

Thomas and Egan Street, Brighton East

3 storeys

Discretionary

Weatherall Road & Morey Road, Beaumaris

2 storeys

Discretionary

 

 

Sophie Thomas works in our Business Support group and has a very strong career background in marketing for business' and customer service. She has very well developed negotiation skills which assist our client's in getting favourable outcomes from other stakeholders. Sophie has previous experience working in local government in her native home in the UK and has a very well developed understanding of the inner workings of local councils.